 |
Background and context
The World Bank/DFID Transport and Rural Infrastructure Services Learning
and Sharing Project (TRISP) aims to strengthen the demand for, and improve
access to relevant knowledge for stakeholders working in transport and
rural utilities in developing countries. The first ‘demand assessment’
phase seeks to provide insights into the information required and by whom
to increase the impact of knowledge in transport and rural utilities in
developing countries; the most appropriate way of targeting relevant information,
raising awareness of its existence and making it accessible to the relevant
stakeholders; and what polices and guidelines already exist which can
be developed and disseminated more widely. This document provides some
interim results. More…
The assessment concentrates on transport, and includes a literature review,
interviews with key informants in the World Bank, DFID and other organisations
working in the sector, and stakeholder workshops in the UK, Peru and Zimbabwe.
The results of these activities (which are described in this report) will
be supplemented by an electronic questionnaire to a broad group of stakeholders,
an e-conference based on information posted on a project web-site, and
follow-up dialogue with key staff in DFID and the World Bank. More…
Existing information and information systems
The literature review found that there is virtually no literature specifically
about the demand for information on transport issues in rural areas in
developing countries, although there is much tacit knowledge and a substantial
volume of knowledge about transport needs and much detailed case-study
information is available in the literature or on web sites. There is a
general assumption about the demand for and value of information for policy
makers and practitioners, and information is recognised as vital for learning
about the impact of development interventions in general. Many organisations
in the sector have information strategies based on this assumed demand,
rather than measured actual demand, and there is much information about
methodologies for developing and delivering different sorts of information
to different kinds of user, and much factual information about transport
infrastructure and constraints, although much of this describes very specific
local situations. More…
DFID and the World Bank are both producers and disseminators of substantial
volumes of information about transport and rural infrastructure, though
their internal learning mechanisms and external information strategies
are very different. The World Bank promotes itself both as a neutral gateway
for knowledge while at the same time promoting itself as a primary producer
of development knowledge. The focus of the Bank’s communication
strategy is to push its branded information out to different parts of
the bank, as well as to client communities mainly through electronic media.
Knowledge processes within DFID’s Infrastructure and Urban Development
Division on the other hand are contracted out to wide range of internal
and external partners, largely under DFID’s knowledge and research
programme (KaR). DFID’s information strategy for transport, and
other rural infrastructure services, has grown organically, alongside
and largely within the research programme, and has focused on printed
materials. Over the last 18 months, IUDD's Communications and Information
Management Resource Centre has been developing a strategy, and a range
of ‘Communications Guidance Notes’ that identify and promote
best practice, to promote greater coherence, particularly for making information
available on the internet. More…
There are an increasing number of initiatives which recognise the important
role of making information more accessible although most professionals
involved in the study described a growing mismatch between their ongoing
– and changing – demands for information to do their jobs
effectively, and the information supply. For most of them, this was the
first time that they had been asked to think strategically about the role
of information in pursuing their development objectives, and they helped
identify a wide range of issues of concern including: out of date mailing
lists, limited information in languages other then English, low awareness
of the information that is available few incentives for staff to produce
information, under use of existing information services, poor coordination,
inconsistent behaviour of professionals who admit not reading, but still
generate long reports; very traditional communication outputs; and little
assessment of the impact of information. More…
What’s unique about transport?
Although transport budgets are large, relatively few professionals work
in the transport sector, they are fragmented, and there are few effective
intermediaries who can pass on information in appropriate formats for
end users. Other sectors (eg water and energy) seem to have developed
better systems over the last few years, possibly because it has been easier
for them to demonstrate impact on poverty. More…
What information do people need?
The study looked at the information seeking patterns of a range of stakeholders,
through the three workshops, and through the secondary information from
information brokers. There is a difference between expressed demand, and
latent demand for information. The former is what information people are
actually saying they want and need to carry out their professional jobs
effectively, and the latter is the information that they don’t yet
know that they need to perform effectively. The study found that the formal
systems that are in place within organisations to make information ‘user-driven’
are generally meeting expressed demand (or the organisation’s estimate
of what it might be), rather than latent demand. Although some of the
assumptions made by information providers about information needs are
correct, they focus on technical information whereas in other sectors
(eg energy) there is an increasing demand for information on the more
social aspects. It is difficult to assess where the real demand for information
is, since information providers tend to describe the demand coming from
their existing audiences, and DFID KaR researchers, who describe the primary
users of their information as design engineers and planners, tend to be
expressing personal opinions rather than the results of empirical studies.
More…
Users want to know what kind of information is being presented to them,
what it will enable them to do, and what other information is available.
They are particularly interested in information relevant to their local
situation that ‘reflects their reality’. Information from
other contexts needs to be ‘localised’ to be of any use. Workshop
participants expressed frustration over content that is: not gender disaggregated;
lacks local content; contains the wrong level of detail for their purpose;
is out of date; is filtered at source rather than allowing them to decide
whether it is useful or not; and the absolute lack of information on water
transport, traffic, and micro-level costs. More…
Since the electronic surveys have not yet been implemented, our understanding
of how stakeholders use information on transport and rural infrastructure
is largely based on the literature. David Webber’s Seven Meanings
of Use describes seven different ways that policy makers use social science
information: to acquire new knowledge, to solve problems, to build on
existing knowledge, to justify political positions, to delay action (by
asking for more information), to triangulate with other information and
to satisfy their intellectual ambitions. Marketing literature suggests
that people are interested in products (or information) that is immediately
useful, is packaged interestingly, and stimulates interactive thought.
The Rockefeller Foundation’s work on Communication for Social Change
(CFSC) project concludes that if external agents wish to contribute to
the process of communication and social change at local level, they need
to engage in dialogue and discussion with members of the community rather
than simply deliver information. More…
Information availability and usefulness
The way users access information seems to depend on: existing knowledge
about the sources of information, existing levels of information technology,
the filters that they consider important, and the type of information
they require, and these vary significantly between geographical regions
and language groups, and between different users (e.g. technical practitioners,
researchers, policy makers). Participants in the workshops obtained information
from a very range of sources, but described how they filter out what they
think will be useful based on what they know, or can divine about the
source - its credibility and reliability, how up to date it is, how much
effort it took to obtain, the language and the potential for interaction
with the source. More…
The workshops also shed some light on the ways that different groups
access information within a region, and between regions. For example,
technical practitioners in Peru found the internet and CD-ROMs the most
useful, whereas the same group in sub-Saharan Africa preferred newsletters,
workshops and seminars, while those in the UK tended to prefer direct
contact with colleagues and fellow-professionals. Government institutions
and policy makers worldwide valued World Bank literature, but in Zimbabwe
preferred printed versions, though it is often not available, and in Peru,
internet versions, though much is not in Spanish. Researchers value a
wide range of information, though often find it difficult to get hold
of for the same reasons. All groups preferred to read documents on paper
than on screen, though the cost of printing is an issue for groups with
scarce resources, especially government policy makers and planners at
the end of the year. Community groups and poor households were not represented
at the workshops, but previous studies show that social networks that
already exist in the community are the main source of information for
the poor, along with information brokers that put in place mechanisms
to deliver information and communicate with marginalized groups e.g. NGOs
working with farmers. More…
The influence of providers and brokers
International information providers (e.g. World Bank, DFID) are increasingly
concentrating on the internet as a means of making information available
though internet access is very uneven across the continents, as well as
within a country. Information providers tend to create their own places
to locate information rather than build on what already exists and this
produces duplication and confusion on the part of users, and is unsustainable.
In the commercial world, ‘takeovers’ and ‘mergers’
build on and strengthen existing products and information without duplication.
This could be mimicked for information centres. There is some brokering
of information though networks and communities of practice, and through
networking events, though it appears that this is biased by users, who
tend to associate particular providers with particular kinds of information,
and by providers who assume they know what their audience want. More…
The way in which information is generated and presented, as well as its
content influences how usable or useful it is for a particular user. Participants
in the workshop in Peru felt the available information not only favoured
African experience, and was rarely translated into Spanish, but also provided
generalised conclusions in a way which made it difficult to relate to
their own situation. They needed more information about the African context
so that they could filter the conclusions through their own screens of
knowledge and expertise to decide if it might be useful for them also.
More…
Conclusions and recommendations for TRISP
Interim conclusions and recommendations focus on:
- Increasing demand for information – through knowledge demand
assessments and information components in all transport and rural services
projects, awareness campaigns, improved linkages between professional
staff, potential users of information, information producers, and systems
to assess information user satisfaction.
- Increasing availability of useful information – through better
sharing of information among existing information providers (e.g. WIN,
SUSTRAN, PIARC, IFRTD and ILO-ASSIST), improved user needs assessment,
specialisation of information providers, improved resources, staff development
and training in communication skills and wider translation of existing
material.
- Packaging information to be appropriate to different users –
through user satisfaction systems, creating the right balance between
electronic and printed media, and encouraging organisations and information
provides involved in transport and rural service issues to link their
work to other sectors & issues.
- Increasing impact of information – through making information
more widely available, involving users and policy makers in generating
and sharing the information, and improved marketing.
- Marketing information more strategically to priority users –
through a specialised Search Engine on the internet for information
on transport, the establishment of outlets for hard copies near to users,
promotion through appropriate networks, incorporation of information
into other DFID publications, encouraging information providers to adopt
clear ‘acquisitions and deletions policies’, and improved
internal mechanisms to keep staff informed about what material is available.
- Improving organisational learning and sharing systems – through
interactive programmes involving professionals, users and communicators,
advisory groups, improved internal knowledge and learning systems in
organisations involved in this sector, with appropriate incentives for
staff.
More…
Next steps
Further activities over the next few weeks to complete this Knowledge
Demand Assessment will include an e-mail questionnaire to transport and
rural service specialists to collect empirical information about what
information they need and how they use it; an e-discussion among transport
and rural service specialists and mini-workshops will be held at DFID
and the World Bank. More…

|
 |
 |